To win a defamation case, what must Sterling prove if the accusation about him is true?

In a defamation case, the key to winning is demonstrating that the statement made was false. If Sterling were to prove that the accusation against him is true, he would not have grounds to win a defamation suit. Defamation hinges on the element of falsehood; truth is a complete defense to defamation claims. Therefore, if the statement is proven to be true, Sterling cannot claim any damages resulting from the accusation because defamation requires an actionable false statement.

It's important to note that the legal principle here is rooted in protecting reputations while allowing for the freedom of speech; if what is said is factual, it does not rise to the level of defamation, regardless of any potential reputational harm it may cause. This is why Sterling would lose if the accusation is verified to be true, which makes the notion that he will win incorrect. The other options do not contradict this understanding; rather, they elaborate on his inability to claim damages when the statement is true.