Which of the following intentional torts is not recognized in Texas?

In Texas, among the intentional torts listed, interference with prospective economic advantages is not formally recognized as a distinct tort. While Texas courts may address similar issues under different legal theories, such as intentional interference with contractual relations or unfair competition, they do not typically classify interference with prospective economic advantage as a standalone tort.

The other options are recognized in Texas law. For instance, the infliction of emotional damages can be pursued under certain circumstances when there is extreme and outrageous conduct. Intentional interference with contractual relations is well-established in Texas, allowing individuals to seek damages when a third party knowingly disrupts a contractual relationship. Malicious prosecution also has recognition within Texas law, allowing individuals to claim damages if they are wrongfully prosecuted without probable cause.

Understanding this context highlights the specificity of tort law in Texas, where not all potential claims for interference are treated equally or recognized. This helps clarify why interference with prospective economic advantages does not have standalone recognition within the state's legal framework.